Review of Liars: Australian New Novelists, by Helen Daniel


It is rare, and heartening, to see a large publishing house in Australia bringing out literary criticism aimed at a non-academic audience. Penguin took the plunge in 1987 with Don Anderson's Hot Copy: witty and contentious, the reviews and articles it brought together from sources as disparate as Southerly and the review pages of the Sydney Morning Herald showed a sharp awareness of how criticism is the business of anyone who believes books to be important. Now, following that success, we have Helen Daniel's Liars, a study of eight recent Australian novelists — Mathers, Ireland, Jolley, Murnane, Carey, Bail, Hasluck and Foster. Like Anderson, Daniel is a reviewer, an enthusiastic and outspoken commentator on recent fiction (in the Melbourne Age and elsewhere). Unlike Hot Copy, though, Liars is planned as a single, detailed and large-scale study of the state of the art in contemporary Australia.

The full text of this essay is available to ALS subscribers

Please sign in to access this article and the rest of our archive.

Published 1 October 1989 in Volume 14 No. 2. Subjects: Australian literary criticism, Book reviewing.

Cite as: Thwaites, Tony. ‘Review of Liars: Australian New Novelists, by Helen Daniel.’ Australian Literary Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, 1989, doi: 10.20314/als.359b5f31ec.