The ‘Hollowness’ of English? A Case for Narratology


As academics whose teaching and research fall under the lazy umbrella term 'theory' we experienced some of the collateral damage of the 'theory wars' of the 1980s and 90s. Now, cheerfully informed by a friend and colleague that 'the war is over; theory lost', we acknowledge that some kind of peacetime tranquillity seems to have settled on English departmental relations. Unless, that is, someone raises the question of what constitutes the discipline of English these days. Responses most often turn on questions about the content of the papers we teach: how important is historical and genre 'coverage'? Where does creative writing fit in? And—still—what about that vague entity, (literary) 'theory'?

The full text of this essay is available to ALS subscribers

Please sign in to access this article and the rest of our archive.

Published 1 June 2013 in Volume 28 No. 1-2. Subjects: English literature - Study & teaching, Literary studies, Impact and literary studies.

Cite as: Meffan, James and Kim L. Worthington. ‘The ‘Hollowness’ of English? A Case for Narratology.’ Australian Literary Studies, vol. 28, no. 1-2, 2013, doi: 10.20314/als.f1ea5591ae.